<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally.</title>
	<link>http://blog.period-three.com/2007/07/18/finally/</link>
	<description>Simple. Measurable. Powerful.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: week 27 black pregnant</title>
		<link>http://blog.period-three.com/2007/07/18/finally/#comment-5233</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.period-three.com/2007/07/18/finally/#comment-5233</guid>
					<description>pregnant weeks week 27 &lt;a href="http://cibodezo.cn/27-week-pregnant.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;27 killer pregnant week&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pregnant weeks week 27 <a href="http://cibodezo.cn/27-week-pregnant.html" rel="nofollow">27 killer pregnant week</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gene</title>
		<link>http://blog.period-three.com/2007/07/18/finally/#comment-744</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.period-three.com/2007/07/18/finally/#comment-744</guid>
					<description>Could be.

If you recall the backlash Google got when they rolled out Gmail with all the contexual ads, the privacy pundits went ape when that hit the web. Turns out after a while, people accepted it and didn't regard it as such a breach of privacy...  But scanning your hard-drive would be a serious violation of privacy as far as i'm concerned.  I for one would definately not be party to that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could be.</p>
<p>If you recall the backlash Google got when they rolled out Gmail with all the contexual ads, the privacy pundits went ape when that hit the web. Turns out after a while, people accepted it and didn&#8217;t regard it as such a breach of privacy&#8230;  But scanning your hard-drive would be a serious violation of privacy as far as i&#8217;m concerned.  I for one would definately not be party to that&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.period-three.com/2007/07/18/finally/#comment-738</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.period-three.com/2007/07/18/finally/#comment-738</guid>
					<description>It could be more about owning the rights to it whenever someone else, whose name might rhyme with Boogle, decides to do something similar. Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be more about owning the rights to it whenever someone else, whose name might rhyme with Boogle, decides to do something similar. Just a thought.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gene</title>
		<link>http://blog.period-three.com/2007/07/18/finally/#comment-737</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.period-three.com/2007/07/18/finally/#comment-737</guid>
					<description>If they were to say, offer their operating system for free, I could see this being accepted... But I sure as heck won't pay for Windows and then accept advertising while i'm using Word (which I paid extra to get)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they were to say, offer their operating system for free, I could see this being accepted&#8230; But I sure as heck won&#8217;t pay for Windows and then accept advertising while i&#8217;m using Word (which I paid extra to get)&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

