<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP to Acquire Logoworks &#8212; okay so now what?</title>
	<link>http://blog.period-three.com/2007/05/02/hp-to-acquire-logoworks-okay-so-now-what/</link>
	<description>Simple. Measurable. Powerful.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jay</title>
		<link>http://blog.period-three.com/2007/05/02/hp-to-acquire-logoworks-okay-so-now-what/#comment-28</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 16:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.period-three.com/2007/05/02/hp-to-acquire-logoworks-okay-so-now-what/#comment-28</guid>
					<description>I guess they're equating 'big' with 'professional', I don't see them as necessarily related to the other. I doubt HP gives a crap about small businesses. It's all because Logoworks is probably hauling in buckets of cash. As far as the 'industry' or whatever, to be honest, most of the logos on their site are not bad, or at least not terrible, and definitely not any worse than work I've seen come out of 'professionals'. So if that's indicative of what you get for $300 or whatever, then it's probably not a bad deal, if you're ok with that level of service. I would hope that most people would want to work with somebody they can call up on the phone or reach by email whenever they need to. And I also have a hunch that the work you or I would get for $300 isn't as good as what they show in their gallery...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess they&#8217;re equating &#8216;big&#8217; with &#8216;professional&#8217;, I don&#8217;t see them as necessarily related to the other. I doubt HP gives a crap about small businesses. It&#8217;s all because Logoworks is probably hauling in buckets of cash. As far as the &#8216;industry&#8217; or whatever, to be honest, most of the logos on their site are not bad, or at least not terrible, and definitely not any worse than work I&#8217;ve seen come out of &#8216;professionals&#8217;. So if that&#8217;s indicative of what you get for $300 or whatever, then it&#8217;s probably not a bad deal, if you&#8217;re ok with that level of service. I would hope that most people would want to work with somebody they can call up on the phone or reach by email whenever they need to. And I also have a hunch that the work you or I would get for $300 isn&#8217;t as good as what they show in their gallery&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

