Comments on: Eyetracking and Usability http://blog.period-three.com/2007/03/15/eyetracking-and-usability/ Simple. Measurable. Powerful. Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:25:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6 by: brigitte nielsen and flavor flav http://blog.period-three.com/2007/03/15/eyetracking-and-usability/#comment-1236 Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:10:07 +0000 http://blog.period-three.com/2007/03/15/eyetracking-and-usability/#comment-1236 <strong>brigitte nielsen and flavor flav</strong> Man i love reading your blog, interesting posts ! brigitte nielsen and flavor flav

Man i love reading your blog, interesting posts !

]]> by: Jay http://blog.period-three.com/2007/03/15/eyetracking-and-usability/#comment-8 Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:48:13 +0000 http://blog.period-three.com/2007/03/15/eyetracking-and-usability/#comment-8 I think the point is that stock photography can't sell your brand. It's generic by definition. If you're brand is that generic, maybe you don't really have much of a brand. I think the point is that stock photography can’t sell your brand. It’s generic by definition. If you’re brand is that generic, maybe you don’t really have much of a brand.

]]> by: Gene http://blog.period-three.com/2007/03/15/eyetracking-and-usability/#comment-6 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:07:44 +0000 http://blog.period-three.com/2007/03/15/eyetracking-and-usability/#comment-6 Understandable, I wonder though about photography that helps "sell" the brand experience... Not that "real people's images" couldn't be part of that, but your point about stock photography seems like it could actualy hurt a website's branding experience. Understandable, I wonder though about photography that helps “sell” the brand experience… Not that “real people’s images” couldn’t be part of that, but your point about stock photography seems like it could actualy hurt a website’s branding experience.

]]>